Deerwalk

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Blended Modality: A Choice of the Students in Higher Education

Keywords: Blended learning, F2F learning, Interaction, Feedback, Exposure e

Authors:
Ambika Prasad Poudel - Department of English Education, Dhankuta Multiple Campus, Dhankuta, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Published Date: 2024-09-10

ABSTRACT

The pedagogical approaches in this 21stcentury world have been modified in many ways with the rapid advancements and innovations in science and technology. The modes of teaching and learning such as distance learning (DL), online learning (OL), and blended learning (BL) are some of the modalities that are becoming popular at present. For some years now, blended modality (BM) of learning is spreading out rapidly and widely as a new pedagogical approach. In recent years, the use of BM is gradually increasing in Nepalese educational institutions too. This study has made an attempt to explore the students’ perception towards blended modality of learning; and its benefits and challenges as a learning approach in the context of higher education in Nepal. Based on a survey- based questionnaire and semi-structured interview as research tools, it has been found in the study that the students had positive attitudes towards BM, and it was very useful to those learners in higher education, who needed to take family and job responsibilities together with their study. Besides, it was reported that though Internet connectivity was one of the main problems, the students were able to take the advantages of both F2F (face to face) and OL through BM.

REFERENCES

1. J. Keengwe & J. J. Kang, “A review of empirical research on blended learning in teacher education programs.”Education and Information Technology. 18 (3) pp 479- 493,2013 2. A. M. Bliuc, P. Goodyear & R. A. Ellis, Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), pp. 231-244, 2007. doi:10.1016/j. iheduc.2007.08.001 3. C. Dziuban, J. Hartman, F. Juge, P. Moskal & S. Sorg, “Blended learning enters the mainstream.” In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, pp. 195-208, 2006. 4. H. Kanuka, C. Brooks & N. Saranchuck “Flexible learning and cost-effective mass offerings.” Paper presented at the Improving University Teaching (IUT), Vancouver, CA, 2009 5. C. R. Graham “Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions.” In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Chichester: Wiley (originally Pfeiffer), 2005, pp 1-32. 6. P. Sharma, “Key concepts in blended learning.”ELT Journal 64(4), pp. 465-458,2010. 7. M. Oliver & K. Trigwell, “Can Blended Learning be redeemed?”E-learning 2(1) pp. 17–26, 2005. 8. M. Driscoll & S. Carliner, Advanced web-based learning strategies. Blended learning as a curriculum design strategy. New York: ASTD Press, 2005. 9. N.Hockly, “Blended learning.”ELT Journal, vol 72(1), pp 97-101, 2018. 10.E. K. DeMulder, E. N. Oudraogo & S. M. Srtibling, “From vision to action: Fostering peaceful co-existence and the common good in a pluralistic society through teacher education.”Peace and Change. 34 (1), pp. 27-48,2009. 11.O. Erstad, “Educating the digital generation: Exploring media literacy for the 21st century.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10 (Special issue), pp. 85-102, 2015. Internet:http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2015/Jubileumsnummer/educating_the_ digital_generation_-_exploring_media_literacy. 12. J. Chung & I. K. Davis,. “An instructional theory for learner control: Revisited.” In M. R. Simonson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the 34 Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA:AACE, pp. 72–86, 1995. 13. J. Poon, “Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences.”MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9 (2), pp 271-289, 2013. 14.C. R. Graham, S. Allen & D. Ure, “Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments.” In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology, Hershey, PA: Idea Group, pp. 253–259, 2005. 15. I. E. Allen, J. Seaman & R. Garrett,“Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States.” Sloan Consortium: USA, 2007, Internet:http:// sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf.[June 14, 2017] 16.R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhoski, R. F. Schmid, R. M. Tamim & P. Abrami“A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the generation to the applied.”Journal of Computing in Higher Education 26 (1), pp. 87-122,2014. 17.C. C Wai & E. L. K. Seng, “Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning tools in a school of business.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 123, pp. 470 – 476, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1446. 18. M Frantz, S. Himalowa, W. Karuguti, A. Kumurenzi, D. Mulenga & M. Sakala“Challenges and opportunities related to postgraduate evidence-based practice module using blended learning.” African Journal of Health Professions Education. Vol 3 (1) pp 15-18, 2011. 19. L.S. Vygotsky. Mind in Society. USA: Harvard University Press, 1978, pp. 79-84. 20.C. Dalsgaard, “Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems.”European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 2006. Internet: http://www.eurodl.org/[March 10, 2018]. 21. T.V. Bondarouk, “Action-oriented group learning in the implementation of information technologies: results from three case studies.”European Journal of Information System.15, pp. 42–53, 2006. Internet:http://www.eurodl.org/? article=228, [March 10, 2018]. 22. S.M Land & M.J. Hannafin “A Conceptual Framework for the Development of Theoriesin-Action with Open-Ended Learning Environments.”Educational Technology Research and Development, volume 44 (3), pp. 37-53, 1996. 35 23.D. Jonassen, “Designing Constructivist Learning Environments.” In C.M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Vol II, Lawrence Erlbaum,pp. 115-140, 1999. 24. L. Cohen, L. Manion & K. Morrison, Research methods in education. London: Routledge,2007, pp. 100-118. 25.C. R. Kothari, Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: International P Ltd publishers, 2004, pp. 55-68. 26.R. Bogdan & S. K. Biklen, Qualitative research for education (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1992, pp. 159-197. 27. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage, 2002, pp. 452-471. 28. H. Jenkins, Convergence culture, where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006, pp. 1-24.


(Total Views: 52)